PackML state model
Define machine states and allowable transitions separately from process modules, device control, and safety functions.
Independent archive notice: Disclaimer: automationworldconference.com is an independent historical archive and technical educational resource. It is not affiliated with, authorized, sponsored, or endorsed by PMMI Media Group, Automation World Magazine, or any prior conference operators. All registered trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Foundation workshop
A practical learning path from field truth to a consistent machine-state interface, with emphasis on modes, PackTags, diagnostics, safe recovery, and evidence-based commissioning.
Archive disclaimer. Disclaimer: automationworldconference.com is an independent historical archive and technical educational resource. It is not affiliated with, authorized, sponsored, or endorsed by PMMI Media Group, Automation World Magazine, or any prior conference operators. All registered trademarks belong to their respective owners.
Define machine states and allowable transitions separately from process modules, device control, and safety functions.
Specify producing, maintenance, manual, and other supported modes, including who may request a transition and what blocks it.
Map standardized status and command data to real sensor quality, actuator confirmation, counts, speed, and reason codes.
Prove state transitions, timeout behavior, interrupted cycles, restart, line handshakes, HMI indication, and data consistency.
A learner should be able to trace a production symptom backward from the reported PackML state through transition conditions, permissives, raw input, field wiring, and the physical process—then identify which evidence discriminates among competing causes.
Force or simulate each credible sensor fault without bypassing safety functions. Confirm that the controller identifies the fault, blocks hazardous motion, presents a useful diagnostic, records the event, and requires an intentional recovery sequence.